Thursday, July 10, 2014

CTDH || Not simply about failure

I am not just simply holding the failure of someone against him.
Had he stood up in a serious way and leveled with us about the reasons for the huge failure of Nanosonic I would have had a totally different view about the situation. Not just that leveling with shareholders is required morally but as someone who is involved with science he should have had an additional special attachment to working on and being restricted by the facts. What do you want more from those who are with you on the same ship to say despite a huge failure on your part that they are willing to overlook that in exchange of just leveling with them about standing in a serious and real way to admit what went wrong, explain it and try to correct as much as possible of the situation? But if you abuse that intention and think you can push a false world of your own creation on others then I may say and keep pointing out your failure not once or twice but a thousand times.

Go back to those videos and see how the refusal to level with shareholders not only continued in a passive way but was also supported by false claims. See how many times orders were not only expected but supposedly already there. We even heard talk about increasing the capacity of the plant. It was just a sears of false claims replacing previous false claims and so on. Yet the guy is walking now as if nothing happened.

He says that they are "laser focused" on the NPC treatment. Well, that does appear to be made as a choice after the huge failure of Nanosonic and Stratton's sudden change of direction can be hardly missed as being a reaction to that failure. It is also hard to miss seeing how Nanosonic was trusted with an order of 50k only at the beginning and never later for any size order as a reaction to the quality of what it can produce and not because there is no market had Nanosonic performed as it was counted on to perform.

Stratton is clearly also responsible for not leveling with shareholders regarding what went wrong with Noanosonic

No comments:

Post a Comment